30th Sep 2005
Too Many Linuxen
I completely agree with the Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols “There are too darned many Linuxes” opinion piece over on linux-watch.com.
There ARE way too many distros.
The point I would add to his piece is: for the outside world looking in (from Mac or Windows-land), the Linux landscape must look like utter confusion and anarchy. I gotta wonder how often an IT mammal is asked to “look at this Linux thing” by their management. They get back from lunch (one martini, because it’s only Monday), start poking around online, and panic - what the heck?! - what to choose?! By 3pm, they’ve worked up a sweat. By 4pm. they’ve located some Microsoft FUD article on how “Windows is cheaper to maintain”. By 5pm, they’ve sent off an email explaining why the company “should hold off on experimenting with Linux at this time, because there appears to be too much choice and crazyness to deal with”. By 5:05, the mammal is out the door, after ducking into their managers office long enough to agree that “maybe we’ll look at this Linux thing in Fiscal 2007″.
Although I may have embellished (what? me? embellish?!), I’m certain this isn’t too far from the truth. I’m firmly ensconced in the Mac & Linux camp, and cut my teeth on 4.1 BSD Unix in 1981 - and even I find it a little challenging to figure out which Linux distro to go with. (server: Debian, client: Ubuntu)
Hmm, maybe I should just make my own! Something like “Buckynix”. Then I could have it the way I want it.
Not!
I completely agree with the Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols “There are too darned many Linuxes” opinion piece over on linux-watch.com.
There ARE way too many distros.
The point I would add to his piece is: for the outside world looking in (from Mac or Windows-land), the Linux landscape must look like utter confusion and anarchy. I gotta wonder how often an IT mammal is asked to “look at this Linux thing” by their management. They get back from lunch (one martini, because it’s only Monday), start poking around online, and panic - what the heck?! - what to choose?! By 3pm, they’ve worked up a sweat. By 4pm. they’ve located some Microsoft FUD article on how “Windows is cheaper to maintain”. By 5pm, they’ve sent off an email explaining why the company “should hold off on experimenting with Linux at this time, because there appears to be too much choice and crazyness to deal with”. By 5:05, the mammal is out the door, after ducking into their managers office long enough to agree that “maybe we’ll look at this Linux thing in Fiscal 2007″.
Although I may have embellished (what? me? embellish?!), I’m certain this isn’t too far from the truth. I’m firmly ensconced in the Mac & Linux camp, and cut my teeth on 4.1 BSD Unix in 1981 - and even I find it a little challenging to figure out which Linux distro to go with. (server: Debian, client: Ubuntu)
Hmm, maybe I should just make my own! Something like “Buckynix”. Then I could have it the way I want it.
Not!

